The internet is full of false best practices email marketing guides and tips. Why is that? There are two main causes:
1. the extrapolation of the results from the speaker’s tiny world to the rest of the world
2. the lack of basic email marketing knowledge.
Today I’ll focus on email open rates topic.
I’m going to reveal some easy to understand technical stuff that will help you detect alone many awful email marketing tips posted here and there.
First of all, please forget about misconceptions such as “my email open rates are calculated by X, the best email marketing company in the world, so why bother?”
If someone doesn’t want to learn anything but remain a brainless copycat, that person shouldn’t be here. Not your case, right? Let’s start…
What Is the Email Open Rate Formula?
Email open rate is expressed as a percentage and is calculated by dividing the number of email messages opened by the total number of email messages sent less those that bounced.
The number of emails sent and the bounces can be measured easily by anyone. What about the number of emails opened? How is it done? There’s no one sitting behind our subscribers and waiting to see whether they open our emails or not…
How Are the Opens Measured?
All email marketing hotshots (Aweber, GetResponse and the others everyone knows) use the same technology: a piece of code is inserted in the emails sent to the recipients.
When someone opens such an email message, that piece of code calls the sender’s server and downloads a tiny 1px x 1px transparent image. While that image is invisible to the recipient of the email, the sender’s server counts the download. In this simple way sender’s system finds out that someone has opened the message sent to the email address “x”.
This is the theory behind the process of measuring the email opens. However…
Theory and Practice Are Different
Irrespective of how awesome your email marketing company is, real life shows how imperfect the measuring technology is…
1. The recipient isn’t connected to the Internet
If someone opens the email while not being connected to the Internet, that piece of code cannot call sender’s server. In that case the open isn’t measured.
2. Some mobile phones and email clients download images by default
The tracking tiny image is downloaded by default even if no human being actually opened that message.
Consequence: even if the recipient hasn’t opened the message, the sender’s server counts the email message as being opened.
3. Some web-based email clients and Android-powered phones block images by default
If the recipient didn’t change the default settings, when the message is opened our wonder tiny image isn’t downloaded. Images are disabled by default. In such case, that piece of code is blocked and no download request is received by the sender’s server.
Consequence: even if the recipient opens the message, the sender’s server doesn’t count the email message as being opened.
4. Gmail’s special case
4.1 A Bug Maybe?
According to Official Gmail Blog, since December 2013 Gmail automatically shows you the images in your messages. This is valid for desktop, Android, iPhone and iPad.
I have more Gmail accounts. In one of them, some messages don’t display images by default. Even if my Settings tab shows this: “Images – Always display external images.”
Consequence: Since usually I don’t click the link “Display images below,” my opens aren’t reported to the sender.
4.2 Recipient’s Decision
If the recipient has a slow Internet connection or limited mobile data, that person may change their setting so that Gmail asks them before showing images.
Consequence: The opens aren’t reported.
Email Open Rate – Conclusions
As you already found out, email open rate is a metric that is far from being accurate.
Many email marketing companies correct the measured rate by applying the following simple and infallible logic: if a recipient clicked any link from your email message, then irrespective of any other measurement that person is deemed to have opened your email.
However, open rates corrected with the help of click-throughs are still different from real open rates. Use this metric with caution and don’t take decisions based only on it.
Bonus: How to Use the Tech Stuff You’ve Just Learned
Every time you read tips on email open rates, remember how they are measured and how different practice and theory are.
Example of a tip I’ve read on a certain business blog:
“Monitor your opens and unopens. If someone hasn’t opened your message in 3 months, it’s a safe bet that you can remove them from your list.”
What do you think now about this tip? Let me help you…
If your email marketing company doesn’t apply the correction mentioned under the heading “Conclusions” and the subscribers who haven’t opened your emails read their emails by using devices that block images … don’t even think about removing them from your list.
You don’t want to remove active subscribers whose actions were ignored by an imperfect technology, do you?
Monitor your CTR instead. That’s an accurate metric.
Actually the original so called tip is 100% wrong. Even if you use CTR instead, it’s still not a safe bet that you can remove inactive subscribers from your list. What’s the hurry?
Try to re-engage them before applying the final solution. Send a series of re-engagement emails – exclusive discounts (real discounts, OK?) and so on, use your imagination. Only if they still remain inactive, remove them from your mailing list.
To Your Email Marketing Success!
Adrian Jock
P.S. What do you think? Use the comment form below and let me know your view…
Adrian, Great information. I was wondering what was going on with Gmail users, and now I understand. Yet I must admit I did a deep clean of my list prior to understanding this change. Yet, I barely notice it now.. so I’m okay with it. We live and learn. I will be back here prior to making big moves in the future. Make it great and keep smiling
Hi Shalonda,
Thanks for stopping by and commenting. In some cases the measured opens are so wrong that now I don’t even bother to check that metric. I had subscribers who almost always were reported as opening my mailings while never clicking my links. False positive opens ;-)
Adrian Jock recently posted: The Truth About Solo Ads Testimonials
Hmmm, interesting article by Adrian. It’s good to know these “facts” rather than rely on guessing or opinions (which as we know, everyone has one, :) ).
I am sure many will read this and scratch their head wondering why they didn’t realize this earlier. But will most people agree with your conclusions? I guess it’s left for them to test things out with their email open rates.
Thanks to Piyush Mathur, for sharing this on Kingged.com
Hi Kingsley,
Thank you for your comment.
As for your question regarding my conclusions, honestly I don’t care whether the majority of the people agree or not with me. There are many idiots, newbies or just amateurs out there. Why should I care whether they agree or not with me? ;-)
A professional opinion isn’t related to democracy and votes. Most of the people aren’t professional and their opinion doesn’t matter.
I only care about the opinions of the email marketing professionals. Have you read an article or anything else where such a professional claims that the open rate is an accurate metric?
Adrian
P.S. Disclaimer & Example: When it comes to using a product, users’ opinions matter if such opinions are related to how fine that product works, etc. However, when it comes to what’s inside that product (for example the lines of codes in case of a piece of software), users opinions don’t matter unless they are professionals.
Email marketers should be interested in email opening rates – I guess every Internet marketer should do because this is one of the ways of making reliable revenue online.
This post has successfully explained why the methods of calculating email open rates should not be relied upon but it fails to CLEARLY suggest a SOLUTION. Perhaps, I am missing something!
This is comment was shared in kingged.com where this post was kingged and shared for Internet marketers.
Sunday – Kingged contributor
Hi Sunday,
Thank you for your comment. Yes, you’re missing something:
1) All big email marketing companies use the “technology” I mentioned. They know that it’s not a very good one but they don’t have a better solution. Do you expect me to have it? ;-) Anyway, it seems that you missed the topic of this article: little known FACTS about email open rates. Maybe you missed the title of the article too.
2) There’s a better metric than open rate, and that one is suggested clearly in the article you’ve read. It’s CTR.
Thanks for your response, Adrian.
You are right – it doesn’t matter what newbies “think”. What matters is what professionals have to say, not just based on opinions for the sake of it, but opinions based on facts and tests and data on ground.
Adrian,
Thanks for sharing this eye-opening information.
You always provide fantastic, usable value on your blog.
I figured something was up with Aweber statistics when one of my subscribers contacted me and asked a question about one of my email messages. I checked my stats because I was sure this person showed as never opening any of my emails.
It turned out that he has read every single message, and here I was almost ready to delete him from my list. He also signed up to my affiliate program after I answered his questions.
So there you go, email marketing works, but there is a lot of misinformation around.
Since then I rely more on tracking analytics for click thru rates than open rates.
Big lesson learned. Until reading your post, I had no idea why this happened.
You have solved this riddle for me. I cannot thank you enough.
~ Jude
Jude Banks recently posted: Are You Building Income Streams Or Stumbling Blocks
You’re very much welcome, Jude. Open rates statistics are so unreliable that I don’t even bother checking them.
Thank you for your comment & for sharing my article :-)
Adrian,
Great write and lovely insight. I bet you totally nailed it with the less accurate open rate.
And I can’t agree more with the open email “offline” part Haha!
Definitely deserve a share and thanks for that!
Reginald recently posted: 3 Must Have (Free and Premium) Content Delivery Network Providers For Bloggers
Hi Reginald,
Thanks for stopping by. I’m glad that you agree with that controversial part of the article regarding the offline opening of the emails LOL
Adrian,
This was very informative! A lot of it I was not aware of.
I use these tools as a guide. Not many of them have been found to be 100% accurate. If your list size is increasing, hopefully your open rate is increasing.
It all boils down to conversions. If your list is growing, use it to promote your product or service and if your sales increase than you know that things are working. If your rates are better but the sales are the same or worse than it may be time to change some things.
Thanks and shared!
Steven J Wilson recently posted: WAIT! Read This Before You Buy Twitter Followers Or Facebook Likes
Hi Steven,
Thank you for stopping by, commenting and sharing.
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! :)
Hi Adrian,
I think it’s my first time here.
I like your explanation of the images download to count opened emails. I knew that already, but not in so many details though.
I don’t sweat my open rate too much these days as I’m not selling stuff through email much anymore, but it’s important to know what’s going on with our lists.
Sylviane Nuccio recently posted: What Is All The Fuss About Hypnotic Writing?
Hi Sylviane,
Welcome to my blog and thank you for resharing the article via your social media accounts :-)
Hi Adrian,
I use this technique once in a while to identify inactive subscribers and I do remove them. However, I have been using a 6 months window. But, may be, it’s a good idea to bump it up to 6 months.
I usually send them a re-engagement email (not seris) asking specifically if they still want to stay in my mailing list and if I don’t hear from them, they are gone!
Thank you for sharing some great tips here. Have a great week!
Regards,
Kumar
Kumar Gauraw recently posted: 15 Technical Things You Must Know About Web Hosting
Hi Kumar,
Thank you for your comment. I think that the period of 6 months is way too longer ;-) Anyway, the real important issue here isn’t the period of time but the way inactive subscribers are identified.
Case 1 – If you define an inactive subscriber a subscriber who didn’t open your emails during a certain period of time, due to an imperfect technology you may consider inactive a subscriber who actually is active.
Case 2 – If you define an inactive subscriber a subscriber who didn’t click any of your links during a certain period of time, you can’t go wrong. That’s the whole point :)
If you use the assessment from Case 1 and send only one re-engagement email, you may remove an active subscriber who for one reason or another missed that last email.
If you use the assessment from Case 2, even if you send only one re-engagement email, you have no chance to remove an active subscriber.
Adrian Jock recently posted: Are Solo Ads with Guaranteed Clicks Really Risk Free?
Nice post as always. You always providing me a good and quality information. Thanks for sharing this information. :)
Just found this via twitter. I’ve a small mailing list and have only just started to look at the analytics side so this article has been incredibly useful. Will focus on click-throughs from now on an not worry about ‘opens’. Cheers.
Hi Adrian. That’s great advice. It amazes me how many people don’t realize how inaccurate their email open count is. Another scenario where the open won’t be counted is when the receiver’s email reader is configured to display the text only version of the email. If that is the case then there is no image to be downloaded because that only exists in the HTML version of the message. It’s so inaccurate that I don’t pay any attention to it. CTR is all that matters, and it isn’t necessarily accurate either because they could copy and paste the displayed link in their browser without the tracking codes that would update the CTR.
Ben recently posted: If you Want to Live, You Have to Keep Moving
Hi Ben,
I don’t see any reason why someone would waste their time by copying and pasting the link in their browser, but it may happen indeed – there are many noobs out there :) Sometimes technically it’s hard for a noob to find the plain link, but other times it’s easier. It depends on how sender’s email is designed.
Anyway, both your points are valid, thank you for your comment.
Adrian Jock recently posted: AWeber vs GetResponse. Marketer’s Best Friends. Epic Review